Angels Online
Home
Fixtures & Results
League Table
Appearances/Goals
Archive
External Links
Isthmian Prem Forums
AFC Hornchurch
Ashford Town (Mx)
Billericay Town
Boreham Wood
Canvey Island
Carshalton Athletic
Dartford
Dover Athletic
Harlow Town
Harrow Borough
Hastings United
Hendon
Heybridge Swifts
Horsham
Maidstone United
Margate
Ramsgate
Staines Town
Sutton United
Tooting & Mitcham
Wealdstone
Isthmian Forum
Sky Sports Live Results Centre
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Thursday, 04 December, 2008, 18:56.46
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register Gallery
News: All personal disputes MUST be kept off the forum or action will be taken against all parties.

+  Angels Online Fans' Forum
|-+  Tonbridge Angels FC Forums
| |-+  Tonbridge Angels Forum
| | |-+  mom vs margate		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Poll
Question: who was your man of the match against margate
Reed   -0 (0%)
Starkey   -0 (0%)
Lovell   -1 (2.6%)
Tyne   -3 (7.7%)
Wilfort   -0 (0%)
Donovan   -2 (5.1%)
Westcott   -1 (2.6%)
Storey   -5 (12.8%)
Cade   -9 (23.1%)
Rook   -6 (15.4%)
Logan   -12 (30.8%)
Kinch   -0 (0%)
Total Votes: 39

Author Topic: mom vs margate  (Read 436 times)
ali_p
Supporter Trusted
First Team
*****

Karma: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 910


I intend to loan my combover to Westie.
mom vs margate
« on: Saturday, 09 February, 2008, 21:20.04 »
make your choice
Logged
EXORCISE THEM!
the hamster
Reserve Team
****

Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 342
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #1 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 13:36.29 »
who to chose HuhHuh. hard today as the team all played so well  Afro
well done tommy all coming good  Wink
Logged
Newrymaner2
Supporter Trusted
First Team
*****

Karma: -12
Offline Offline

Posts: 675
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #2 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 14:31.32 »
Donovan.
Let's hope Tommy watched closely today.

Beales and Donovan.
Dream team.
angel
Logged
Jamie
Supporter Trusted
First Team
*****

Karma: -452
Online Online

Posts: 1,066
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #3 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 15:41.06 »
cade for me played really well yesterday  Afro
Logged
ali_p
Supporter Trusted
First Team
*****

Karma: 6
Offline Offline

Posts: 910


I intend to loan my combover to Westie.
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #4 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 17:17.18 »
Cade looks a decent signing, the kind of player who will complement Carl Rook really well.

With Rook being cup-tied for tuesday I would expect Cade and Logan to play up front.
Logged
EXORCISE THEM!
gerbil
Trainee
**

Karma: 1
Offline Offline

Posts: 63
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #5 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 18:13.00 »
A very hard decision as it was a good all round team effort but fraser logan did just enough for me to get my vote .good game tommy lets keep it up and move up the league. Afro
Logged
KB
Supporter Trusted
Reserve Team
*****

Karma: -4
Online Online

Posts: 302
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #6 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 18:43.33 »
Fraser for me too, although a close decision.  I was very impressed with Jamie Cade and looking forward to seeing what Michael Phillips can do for us.  Presumably he will be cuptied for Tuesday though.

PS: Happy birthday, Carl Rook (twenty-five today) - so lots more goalscoring years in him, hopefully with the Angels.   Smiley
Logged
Gazza
Global Moderator
Team Coach
*****

Karma: -176
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,991


Class Act
Re: mom vs margate
« Reply #7 on: Sunday, 10 February, 2008, 19:28.25 »
Difficult decision for yesterday's MotM, was a solid all-round team performance. Donners and Cadey both did very well but for me, it's gotta be Fraser. I'm sure a few were surprised Tommy picking him ahead of Kirk but it turned out to be the correct decision and completely justified. Afro
Logged
"There's nothing like wedging the pikeys!" - Sir Mickey Collins, 23rd February 2008
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Angels Online Fans' Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.9.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved. 		Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.107 seconds with 21 queries.